RESEARCH NOTES / 3 min read

Keith Baar’s isometrics: useful ideas, not a magic hold time

The channel’s two-year experience sits beside several different evidence streams: engineered ligaments, human tendon adaptations and pain studies. Their findings are interesting precisely because they answer different questions.

Watch on YouTube

The video opens on YouTube. No player or external tracker is loaded here.

On this page
The takeaway

Isometrics can be a useful loading tool. A laboratory signalling response, short-term pain relief and long-term tendon adaptation should not be treated as three proofs of one universal protocol.

Where the short-loading idea came from

Paxton and colleagues studied engineered ligaments, not injured human wrists. Mechanical stimulation activated signalling pathways, with a response that became less sensitive during continued loading and recovered after a period without it. Intermittent loading improved collagen-related outcomes in that model. This supports a biological hypothesis about dose and recovery; it does not validate a fixed ten-minute routine, a six-hour schedule or a particular hold duration for every human tendon. The channel’s personal experience is useful context, but it is not the missing clinical comparison. [1]

Human tendons do adapt to loading

The Lazarczuk review included 61 articles and 763 participants. Its pooled standardised changes were 0.74 for stiffness, 0.82 for Young’s modulus and 0.22 for cross-sectional area. These are standardised effect sizes, not 74%, 82% and 22% increases. They were calculated from pre-to-post changes in intervention groups, rather than one universal comparison against an untreated control. The results support tendon adaptation to mechanical loading, while leaving uncertainty about the best dose and transfer to armwrestling. [2]

FIGURE 01Reported data

Tendon adaptation is not just an increase in size

Stiffness0.74 (0.62–0.86)
Young’s modulus0.82 (0.58–1.07)
Cross-sectional area0.22 (0.12–0.33)
0.0SMD · 95% CI1.2
Lazarczuk et al. (2022): pooled standardised pre-to-post changes with 95% confidence intervals. Based on 61 articles overall, with different contributing groups for each outcome. SMD is unitless—not a percentage or an effect against a single control group.
View the values
Tendon adaptation is not just an increase in size
FIGUREEstimate95% confidence interval
Stiffness0.740.62 - 0.86
Young’s modulus0.820.58 - 1.07
Cross-sectional area0.220.12 - 0.33

Less pain is not the same as repaired tissue

A small patellar-tendinopathy study involving six participants reported immediate pain relief after isometric exercise. Later evidence was less uniform. A systematic review of ten trials found no clear overall superiority of isometrics over isotonic exercise for chronic tendinopathy, and responses varied. An athlete may find isometrics comfortable or helpful, but an analgesic response does not establish that a tendon has healed or is ready for maximal table loading. Knee findings are not a diagnosis or treatment plan for wrist pain. [3, 4]

What survives the move from laboratory to training

The defensible common ground is controlled loading, progression and attention to the person’s response. Intensity, muscle length and intent matter alongside duration. There is no established boundary where a short hold only stiffens tissue and a longer hold uniquely “heals” it. Likewise, observational reports from climbers cannot isolate the mechanism of a combined routine. Use isometrics as one possible component of a wider programme, not an obligation to add more daily loading on top of an already demanding week. [2, 4, 5]

What this does not tell us

The evidence spans cell-based models, healthy lower-limb tendons and patients with different tendinopathies. None establishes one optimal armwrestling rehabilitation protocol. Persistent pain, weakness or instability warrants professional assessment rather than progressively harder self-testing.

Source materials

Tendons & isometrics: visual evidencePDF in English · 9 pages

References

Based on the supplied English video transcript and the sources below.

  1. Paxton JZ, Hagerty P, Andrick JJ, Baar K. (2012). Optimizing an Intermittent Stretch Paradigm Using ERK1/2 Phosphorylation Results in Increased Collagen Synthesis in Engineered Ligaments. Tissue Engineering Part A. 18:277–284.
  2. Lazarczuk SL, et al. (2022). Mechanical, Material and Morphological Adaptations of Healthy Lower Limb Tendons to Mechanical Loading: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine. 52:2405–2429.
  3. Rio E, et al. (2015). Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar tendinopathy. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 49:1277–1283.
  4. Clifford C, Challoumas D, Paul L, Syme G, Millar NL. (2020). Effectiveness of isometric exercise in the management of tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 6:e000760.
  5. Oranchuk DJ, Storey AG, Nelson AR, Cronin JB. (2019). Isometric training and long-term adaptations: Effects of muscle length, intensity, and intent: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 29:484–503.